UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x                               ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006

or

o                                  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                  to                  

Commission file number 1-12139

SEALED AIR CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (201) 791-7600

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $4,166,000,000, based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

There were 80,672,810 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share, issued and outstanding as of January 31, 2007.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

SEALED AIR CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Table Of Contents

2

PART I

Item 1.                        Business

Sealed Air Corporation (the “Company”), operating through its subsidiaries, manufactures and sells a wide range of food and protective packaging products.

The Company conducts substantially all of its business through two direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cryovac, Inc. and Sealed Air Corporation (US). These two subsidiaries directly and indirectly own substantially all of the assets of the business and conduct operations themselves and through subsidiaries around the globe. References herein to the Company include, collectively, the Company and its subsidiaries, except where the context indicates otherwise.

Segments

The Company operates in two reportable business segments: (i) Food Packaging and (ii) Protective Packaging, described more fully below. Information concerning the Company’s reportable segments, including net sales, operating profit and assets, appears in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Food Packaging Products

The Company’s principal food packaging products are flexible materials, associated packaging equipment systems, rigid containers and absorbent pads. These products package a broad range of perishable foods and are marketed globally. The Company primarily sells the products in this segment to food processors, distributors, supermarket retailers and food service businesses.

Flexible Materials and Related Systems

The Company produces a variety of high-performance proprietary flexible vacuum shrink products, including shrink bags and shrink films, as well as non-shrink structures and associated packaging equipment systems, marketed and sold primarily under the Cryovac® trademark. Customers use these products to package a broad range of perishable foods such as fresh meat and poultry, smoked and processed meat, cheese, produce, seafood, baked goods, and processed and prepared foods such as soups, stews, condiments and sauces for restaurants and institutions.

The Company’s principal food packaging materials offerings are shrink bags, shrink films and non-shrink structures. The bags and films are co-extruded, multi-layered materials that, when exposed to heat, mold themselves to the shape of the product. The non-shrink structures are multi-layered plastic materials used to package perishable foods and shelf-stable products such as syrups and toppings. The Company’s flexible materials start with a co-extruded film produced by combining two or more resins into a multi-layered film. Some of these films are subsequently laminated to other films to provide additional properties. The Company generally produces films and bags in barrier and permeable forms, depending on the extent to which customers want oxygen or other gases to pass through the material. For fresh-cut produce, the Company produces films that permit gases to pass through at various rates, matching the varying respiration rates of different vegetables, thereby extending shelf life. For the heat-and-serve category, the Company offers its Simple Steps™ package, which is an easy-open microwavable package designed with Cryovac® vacuum skin packaging technology and a unique self-venting feature. The Company’s Darfresh® product offerings provide vacuum skin packaging for a variety of foods. The Company also offers films, tubing and connectors for use in manufacturing bags and pouches for a wide variety of medical applications. Additionally, the Company thermoforms packaging materials for medical and technical products. Many of the Company’s offerings in the medical field are manufactured using

3

technology comparable to that used to manufacture the Company’s food packaging products and are similar in form to those products.

The Company’s principal food packaging equipment offerings are rotary chamber vacuum systems, vertical form-fill-seal pouch packaging systems, dispensing equipment, manual and automated loading units, shrink tunnels, bagging systems and auxiliary equipment. Equipment offerings may be installed to package foods in shrink, vacuum or vacuum skin packages, which can utilize the Company’s films and bags. The vertical pouch-packaging units may be used to package hot-fill or cold-fill pumpable foods using the Company’s non-shrink structures. The Company’s case ready packaging customers, principally meat and poultry processors, purchase trays and pads as discussed below, specially designed films, and packaging equipment to package consumer cuts of meat and poultry products at a central location prior to shipment to the supermarket. Case ready packages are ready for the meat case upon arrival at the retail store.

Rigid Packaging and Absorbent Pads

The Company sells foam and solid plastic trays and containers that customers use to package a wide variety of food products. The Company manufactures such products in its own facilities in various regions or has them fabricated by other manufacturers. Food processors and supermarkets use these products to protect and display fresh meat, poultry, dairy, produce and other food products. The Company also manufactures and sells absorbent pads used for food packaging, such as its Dri-Loc® absorbent pads.

Protective Packaging Products

The Company’s principal protective packaging products provide cushioning, surface protection and void fill. The Company sells its protective packaging products and systems to distributors and manufacturers in a wide variety of industries. The products in this segment enable end users to provide a high degree of protection in packaging their items. They also aid product display and merchandising.

Cushioning and Surface Protection Products

The Company manufactures and markets Bubble Wrap® and AirCap® air cellular packaging materials, which consist of air encapsulated between two layers of plastic film, each containing a barrier layer to retard air loss. This material forms a pneumatic cushion to protect products from damage through shock or vibration during shipment. Also, the Company sells performance shrink films under the Cryovac®, Opti® and CorTuff® trademarks for product display and merchandising applications. Customers use these films to “shrink-wrap” a wide assortment of industrial and consumer products. The Company offers Shanklin® and Opti® shrink packaging systems for these applications. The Company’s Instapak® polyurethane foam packaging systems (which consist of proprietary blends of polyurethane chemicals, high performance polyolefin films and specially designed dispensing equipment) provide protective packaging for a wide variety of products. These products include the Instapak® Continuous Foam Tube packaging system. The Company generally sells CelluPlank® plank foams and Stratocell® laminated polyethylene foams to fabricators and converters for packaging and non-packaging applications. The Company also manufactures thin polyethylene foams in roll and sheet form under the trademarks Cell-Aire® and Cellu-Cushion®. Korrvu® packaging is the Company’s suspension and retention packaging offering. In addition, the Company makes insulation products with foil-laminated air cellular materials.

The Company manufactures and markets Jiffy® protective mailers and other durable mailers and bags in several standard sizes. The Company’s principal protective mailers are lightweight, tear-resistant mailers marketed under various trademarks, including Jiffylite®, Mail Lite® and TuffGard®, lined with air cellular cushioning material, as well as the widely used Jiffy® padded mailers made from recycled kraft paper padded with macerated recycled newspaper. The Company’s durable mailers and bags, composed of multi-layered polyolefin film, are lightweight, water-resistant and puncture-resistant and are available in

4

tamper-evident varieties. The Company markets these mailers and bags under the ShurTuff®, Trigon®, Lab Pak®, and Keepsafe® trademarks and other brands. The Company also manufactures and sells paper packaging products under the trademarks Kushion Kraft®, Custom Wrap™, Jiffy Packaging™ and Void Kraft™.

The Company also offers inflatable packaging systems. Its Fill-Air® inflatable packaging system converts rolls of polyethylene film into continuous perforated chains of air-filled cushions. The Company’s Fill-Air® RF system consists of a compact, portable inflator and self-sealing inflatable plastic bags. In addition, its NEWAIR I.B.™ 200 and high speed 600 packaging systems provide on-site, on-demand Barrier Bubble® cushioning material. The Company also markets its PriorityPak™ system, a high-speed product containment and protective packaging solution with advance sensor technology, to mail-order and Internet fulfillment applications. The Company produces and markets converting systems that convert some of the Company’s packaging materials, such as air cellular cushioning materials, thin polyethylene foam and paper into sheets of a pre-selected size and quantity, or in the case of the Company’s recycled kraft paper, into paper dunnage material. Recently the Company introduced its FillTeck™ line of equipment and materials and markets this product for applications requiring on-site production of high performance air-filled quilted cushioning material.

Other Products

The Company manufactures and sells a number of other products, such as specialty adhesive tapes, solar collectors and covers for swimming pools, and products related to the elimination and neutralization of static electricity. The Company also manufactures loose-fill polystyrene packaging.

Foreign Operations

The Company operates in the United States and in 50 other countries, and its products are distributed in those countries as well as in other parts of the world. In maintaining its foreign operations, the Company faces risks inherent in these operations, such as those of currency fluctuations. Information on currency exchange risk appears in Part II, Item 7A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Financial information about geographic areas setting forth net sales and total long-lived assets for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 appears in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which information is incorporated herein by reference. The Company maintains programs to comply with the various laws, rules and regulations that it may be subject to in the many countries in which it operates. See “Environmental Matters,” below.

Marketing, Distribution and Customers

The Company’s global sales and marketing staff numbers approximately 2,500 employees, who sell and market the Company’s products to and through a large number of distributors, fabricators and converters, as well as directly to end users such as food processors, food service businesses, and manufacturers.

To support its food packaging customers, the Company operates food science laboratories that assist customers in identifying the appropriate food packaging materials and systems to meet their needs. The Company also offers customized graphic design services to its customers.

To assist its marketing efforts for its protective packaging products and to provide specialized customer services, the Company operates packaging laboratories in many of its facilities. These laboratories are staffed by professional packaging engineers and equipped with drop-testing and other equipment used to develop and test cost-effective package designs to meet the particular protective packaging requirements of each customer.

5

The Company has no material long-term contracts for the distribution of its products. In 2006, no customer or affiliated group of customers accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated net sales.

Although net sales of both food packaging products and protective packaging products tend to be slightly higher in the fourth quarter, the Company does not consider seasonality to be material to its consolidated business or to either reportable business segment.

Competition

Competition for most of the Company’s packaging products is based primarily on packaging performance characteristics, service and price. Since competition is also based upon innovations in packaging technology, the Company maintains ongoing research and development programs to enable it to maintain technological leadership. There are other companies producing competing products that are well established.

There are other manufacturers of food packaging products, some of which are companies offering similar products that operate on a global basis and others that operate in a region or single country. Competing manufacturers produce a wide variety of food packaging based on plastic, paper, metals and other materials. In rigid packaging, the Company is generally one of many suppliers in the geographic areas in which it operates. The Company believes that it is one of the leading suppliers of (i) flexible food packaging materials and related systems in the principal geographic areas in which it offers those products, (ii) solid plastic trays for case ready meat products in the United States, and (iii) absorbent pads for food products to supermarkets and to meat and poultry processors in the United States.

The Company’s protective packaging products compete with similar products made by other manufacturers and with a number of other packaging materials that customers use to provide protection against damage to their products during shipment and storage. Among the competitive materials are various forms of paper packaging products, expanded plastics, corrugated die cuts, loose fill packaging materials, strapping, envelopes, reinforced bags, boxes and other containers, and various corrugated materials. The Company’s Instapak® packaging and its plank and laminated foam products also compete with various types of molded foam plastics, fabricated foam plastics, mechanical shock mounts, and wood blocking and bracing systems. The Company believes that it is one of the leading suppliers of air cellular cushioning materials containing a barrier layer, inflatable packaging, shrink films for industrial and commercial applications, protective mailers, polyethylene foam and polyurethane foam packaging systems in the principal geographic areas in which it sells these products.

Raw Materials

The principal raw materials used in both of the Company’s reportable business segments are polyolefin and other petrochemical-based resins and films, and paper and wood pulp products. The Company also purchases corrugated materials, cores for rolls of products such as films and Bubble Wrap® cushioning, inks for printed materials, and blowing agents used in the expansion of foam packaging products. In addition, the Company offers a wide variety of specialized packaging equipment, some of which it manufactures or has manufactured to its specifications, some of which it assembles and some of which it purchases from other suppliers.

The raw materials for the Company’s products generally have been readily available on the open market and in most cases are available from several suppliers. Natural disasters such as hurricanes, as well as political instability and terrorist activities, may negatively impact the production or delivery capabilities of refineries and natural gas and petrochemical suppliers in the future. These factors could lead to increased prices for the Company’s raw materials, curtailment of supplies and allocation of raw materials by the Company’s suppliers. Some materials used in the Company’s protective packaging products are sourced

6

from materials recycled in the Company’s manufacturing operations or obtained through participation in recycling programs.

Research and Development Activities

The Company maintains a continuing effort to develop new products and to improve its existing products and processes, including developing new packaging and non-packaging applications for its products. From time to time, the Company also acquires and commercializes new packaging designs or techniques developed by others. The Company has joint research and development projects combining the technical capabilities of its food packaging operations and its protective packaging operations. The Company spent $78.2 million for Company-sponsored research and development in 2006, compared with $75.8 million during 2005, and $73.2 million during 2004.

Patents and Trademarks

The Company is the owner or licensee of a number of United States and foreign patents, patent applications, trademarks and trademark registrations that relate to many of its products, manufacturing processes and equipment. The Company believes that its patents and trademarks collectively provide a competitive advantage. Neither of the Company’s reportable segments is dependent upon any single patent or trademark alone. Rather, the Company believes that its success depends primarily on its marketing, engineering and manufacturing skills and on its ongoing research and development efforts. The Company believes that the expiration or unenforceability of any of its patents, applications, licenses or trademark registrations would not be material to the Company’s business or financial position.

Environmental Matters

As a manufacturer, the Company is subject to various laws, rules and regulations in the countries, jurisdictions and localities in which it operates covering the release of materials into the environment, regarding standards for the treatment, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. In 2006, the European Parliament approved a major expansion of the European Union’s chemical regulations. The legislation is known as REACH or Registration, Evaluation and Authorization of Chemicals. REACH, which becomes effective in June 2007, is expected to have a widespread impact on industries and products worldwide through trade in and with the European Union. The Company is working with its suppliers to manage the impact of REACH on its operations and to insure compliance with its provisions. The Company reviews environmental laws and regulations pertaining to its operations and believes that compliance with current environmental laws and regulations has not had a material effect on the Company’s capital expenditures or financial position.

In some jurisdictions in which the Company’s packaging products are sold or used, laws and regulations have been adopted or proposed that seek to regulate, among other things, recycled or reprocessed content and sale or disposal of packaging materials. In addition, customer demand continues to evolve for packaging materials that are viewed as being “environmentally sound” or that minimize the generation of solid waste. The Company maintains programs designed to comply with these laws and regulations, to monitor their evolution, and to meet this customer demand. These issues can be a competitive advantage for the Company given the inherent source reduction benefits of many of its processes and products. One advantage inherent in many of the Company’s products is that thin, lightweight packaging solutions reduce customer waste and transportation costs in comparison to available alternatives. The Company continues to evaluate and implement new technologies in this area as they become available.

The Company also supports its customers’ interests in eliminating waste by offering or participating in collection programs for some of the Company’s products or product packaging and for materials used in some of the Company’s products. When possible, materials collected through these programs are reprocessed and either reused in the Company’s protective packaging operations or offered to other

7

manufacturers for use in other products. In addition, recent gains made in internal recycling programs have allowed the Company to improve its net raw material yield, thus mitigating the impact of rising resin costs, while lowering solid waste disposal costs.

Employees

As of December 31, 2006, the Company had approximately 17,400 employees worldwide. Approximately 7,300 of those employees were in the U.S., with approximately 600 of those covered by collective bargaining agreements. Of the approximately 10,100 Company employees who were outside the U.S., approximately 6,000 were covered by collective bargaining agreements. Outside of the U.S., many of the covered employees are represented by works councils or industrial boards, as is customary in the jurisdictions in which they are employed. The Company believes that its employee relations are satisfactory.

Available Information

The Company’s Internet address is www.sealedair.com. The Company makes available, free of charge, on or through its web site at www.sealedair.com, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, known as the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files these materials with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Item 1A.                Risk Factors

Introduction

Investors should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. These are the most significant factors that make investing in the Company risky; however, they are not the only factors that should be considered in making an investment decision.

This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains and may incorporate by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, or from exhibits, forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including the risks faced by the Company described below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in documents incorporated by reference in this report.

The Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of the Company’s securities could decline due to any of these risks, and investors in the Company’s securities may lose all or part of their investment.

Asbestos Litigation and Related Litigation

If the settlement of the asbestos claims that the Company has agreed to is not implemented, the Company will not be released from the various asbestos-related, fraudulent transfer, successor liability, and indemnification claims made against it arising from a 1998 transaction with W. R. Grace & Co. Further, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit seeking class action status concerning the Company’s public disclosures regarding these asbestos-related claims. The Company is also a defendant in a number of asbestos-related actions in Canada arising from Grace’s activities in Canada prior to 1998.

On November 27, 2002, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the Official Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants and the Official Committee of Asbestos Property Damage Claimants appointed to represent asbestos claimants in the W. R. Grace & Co. bankruptcy case to resolve

8

all current and future asbestos-related claims made against the Company and its affiliates. The settlement will also resolve the fraudulent transfer claims and successor liability claims, as well as indemnification claims by Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. and affiliated companies in connection with the Cryovac transaction. The Cryovac transaction was a multi-step transaction, completed on March 31, 1998, which brought the Cryovac packaging business and the former Sealed Air Corporation’s business under the common ownership of the Company. The parties to the agreement in principle signed a definitive settlement agreement as of November 10, 2003 consistent with the terms of the agreement in principle. On June 27, 2005, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, where the Grace bankruptcy case is pending, signed an order approving the definitive settlement agreement. Although Grace is not a party to the settlement agreement, under the terms of the order, Grace is directed to comply with the settlement agreement subject to limited exceptions. If the settlement agreement does not become effective, either because Grace fails to emerge from bankruptcy or because Grace does not emerge from bankruptcy with a plan of reorganization that is consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement, then the Company will not be released from the various asbestos-related, fraudulent transfer, successor liability, and indemnification claims made against the Company and its affiliates noted above, and all of these claims would remain pending and would have to be resolved through other means, such as through agreement on alternative settlement terms or trials. In that case, the Company could face liabilities that are significantly different from its obligations under the settlement agreement. The Company cannot estimate at this time what those differences or their magnitude may be. In the event these liabilities are materially larger than the current existing obligations, they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Although Grace filed a proposed plan of reorganization with the bankruptcy Court in January 2005, the Company cannot predict when a final plan of reorganization will become effective or whether the final plan will be consistent with the terms of the settlement agreement.

The Company is a defendant in the case of Senn v. Hickey, et al. (Case No. 03-CV-4372) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey (Newark). This lawsuit seeks class action status on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired securities of the Company during the period from March 27, 2000 through July 30, 2002. The lawsuit names the Company and five current and former officers and directors of the Company as defendants. One of these individuals and the Company remain as defendants after a partial grant of the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action. The plaintiff’s principal allegations against the defendants are that during the above period the defendants materially misled the investing public, artificially inflated the price of the Company’s common stock by publicly issuing false and misleading statements and violated U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, by failing to properly account and accrue for the Company’s contingent liability for asbestos claims arising from past operations of Grace. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages and other relief. If the Court determines that the Company is liable in this case, the Company could be required to pay substantial damages, which the Company cannot estimate at this time and which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. On October 3, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to certify a class of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired the securities of the Company during the period from March 27, 2000 through July 30, 2002. On November 22, 2006, plaintiff filed an amended motion for class certification, seeking to withdraw as a class representative and the substitution of a new class representative, the State of Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System. Discovery concerning class certification and the merits is ongoing.

Since November 2004, the Company and specified subsidiaries have been named as defendants in a number of cases, including a number of putative class actions, brought in Canada as a result of Grace’s alleged marketing, manufacturing or distributing of asbestos or asbestos-containing products in Canada prior to the Cryovac Transaction. Grace has agreed to defend and indemnify the Company and its subsidiaries in these cases. The Canadian cases are currently stayed, and Grace’s proposed plan of reorganization provides for payment of these claims and enforcement of the plan of reorganization in the Canadian courts. However, if Grace’s final plan does not make the same provisions or if the Canadian courts refuse to enforce Grace’s final plan in the Canadian courts, and if in addition Grace is unwilling or

9

unable to defend and indemnify the Company and its subsidiaries in these cases, then the Company could be required to pay substantial damages, which the Company cannot estimate at this time and which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

For further information concerning these matters, see Note 16, “Commitments and Contingencies,” of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is contained in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, under “Asbestos Settlement and Related Costs,” “Cryovac Transaction,” and “Contingencies Related to the Cryovac Transaction.”

Raw Materials and Energy

Raw material pricing, availability and allocation by suppliers as well as other energy-related costs may negatively impact the Company’s results of operations, including its profit margins.

The Company uses petrochemical-based raw materials to manufacture many of its food and protective packaging products. During most of 2006 petrochemical-based raw material and other energy-related costs increased, with oil futures setting a record high. This negatively impacted the Company’s profit margins. Continued increases in market demand for petrochemical-based raw materials and energy could increase costs for the Company. Natural disasters such as hurricanes, as well as political instability and terrorist activities, may negatively impact the production or delivery capabilities of refineries and natural gas and petrochemical suppliers in the future. These factors could lead to increased prices for the Company’s raw materials, curtailment of supplies and allocation of raw materials by the Company’s suppliers, which could reduce revenues and profit margins and harm relations with the Company’s customers and which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Animal and Food-Related Health Issues

The effects of animal and food-related health issues such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy, also known as “mad cow” disease, foot-and-mouth disease and avian influenza or “bird-flu,” as well as other health issues affecting the food industry, may lead to decreased revenues for the Company.

The Company manufactures and sells food packaging products, among other products. Various health issues affecting the food industry have in the past and may in the future have a negative effect on the sales of food packaging products. During 2006, additional cases of mad cow disease were confirmed and incidents of bird flu have continued to surface in various countries. Outbreaks of animal diseases such as mad cow or foot-and-mouth disease, for example, may lead governments to restrict exports and imports of potentially affected animals and food products, leading to decreased demand for the Company’s products and possibly also to the culling or slaughter of significant numbers of the animal population otherwise intended for food supply. Also, consumers may change their eating habits as a result of perceived problems with certain types of food. These restrictions and changes may lead to reduced sales of food packaging products by the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Global Operations

The global nature of the Company’s operations in the United States and in fifty foreign countries exposes it to numerous risks that could materially adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

10

The Company operates in the United States and in 50 other countries, and its products are distributed in those countries as well as in other parts of the world. The Company continues to expand its global presence as net sales outside the United States in 2006 made up approximately 52% of the Company’s total net sales. Additionally the Company has 73 manufacturing facilities and approximately 10,100 employees located outside the United States.

As a result of its global operations, the Company is exposed to economic, political, business and market conditions in the geographic areas in which it conducts business. Changes in domestic or foreign laws, rules or regulations (such as the REACH legislation discussed above in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Environmental Matters”), or governmental or agency actions can negatively affect the Company’s ability to carry on its business. Governments may impose restrictive or protective import/export requirements as well as other trade measures that may have a negative impact on the Company. Some of the countries in which the Company’s subsidiaries operate have significantly different laws on the enforcement of intellectual property and contract rights. As a global entity, the Company may also have greater exposure to the acts and effects of war or terrorism.

The Company is exposed to market risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company may use financial instruments from time to time to manage exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, which use exposes the Company to counterparty credit risk for nonperformance. Additionally, some of the Company’s subsidiaries may operate in countries that have highly inflationary economies.

Global Manufacturing Strategy

The Company has begun the first phase of a new global manufacturing strategy. The costs of the global manufacturing strategy could exceed the benefits if market forces or other factors negatively impact the execution and fulfillment of the strategy.

The Company has begun the first phase of a new global manufacturing strategy. This strategy includes an expansion of the Company’s global production capabilities in developing markets around the world, as well as a realignment of its existing production into manufacturing centers of excellence. The goal of this multi-year program is to expand capacity in growing markets in developing countries, further improve the Company’s operating efficiencies, lower its overall cost structure and implement new technologies more effectively. There are risks inherent in the undertaking of such a program, including the stability and sustainability of developing markets, shifts in customer preferences, competitive forces and technologies, cost overruns and unanticipated consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Reliance on Subsidiaries

The Company’s subsidiaries hold substantially all of its assets and liabilities and conduct substantially all of its operations, and as a result the Company relies on distributions or advances from its subsidiaries.

The Company conducts substantially all of its business through two direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, Cryovac, Inc. and Sealed Air Corporation (US). These two subsidiaries directly and indirectly own substantially all of the assets of the Company’s business and conduct operations themselves and through other subsidiaries around the globe. Therefore, the Company depends on distributions or advances from its subsidiaries to meet its debt service and other obligations and to pay dividends with respect to shares of its common stock. Contractual provisions, laws or regulations to which the Company or any of its subsidiaries may become subject, as well its subsidiaries’ financial condition and operating requirements, may reduce funds available for service of its indebtedness, dividends, and general corporate purposes.

11

Volatility of Stock Price, Volume Sales and Large Holdings

The price of the Company’s common stock historically has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations, which may make it difficult for investors to resell the common stock, and the sale of substantial amounts of the Company’s common stock could adversely affect the price of the common stock. One shareholder has been identified as having sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 28,916,696 shares, or approximately 35.9%, of the Company’s common stock, and another shareholder has been identified as having sole dispositive power with respect to 12,710,000 shares, or approximately 15.8%, of the Company’s common stock.

The market price of the Company’s common stock historically has experienced and may continue to experience significant price and volume fluctuations similar to those experienced by the broader stock market in recent years. In addition, the Company’s announcements of its quarterly operating results, future developments relating to the W. R. Grace bankruptcy, additional asbestos or other litigation against the Company, the effects of animal and food-related health issues, spikes in raw material and energy-related costs, changes in general conditions in the economy or the financial markets and other developments affecting the Company, its affiliates or its competitors could cause the market price of the common stock to fluctuate substantially.

The sale of substantial amounts of the Company’s common stock could adversely affect its price. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, dated as of December 31, 2006, Davis Selected Advisers, L.P. reported sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 28,916,696 shares, or approximately 35.9%, of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, and according to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC, dated as of February 7, 2007, Capital Research and Management Company reported sole dispositive power with respect to 12,710,000 shares, or approximately 15.8%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, 2,072,874 shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the Company’s contingent stock plan and directors’ stock plan. Issuance of such reserved shares would cause dilution of stock holdings. Moreover, as of December 31, 2006, nine million shares of the Company’s common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to the settlement of the asbestos litigation upon the effectiveness of a plan of reorganization in the bankruptcy of W. R. Grace. The sale or the availability for sale of a large number of shares of the Company’s common stock in the public market could adversely affect the price of the common stock.

While the Schedules 13G/A filed by Davis Selected Advisers and Capital Research and Management indicate that the referenced shares of the Company’s common stock were not acquired for the purpose of changing or influencing the control of the Company, if either stockholder were to change its purpose of holding the Company’s common stock from investment to attempting to influence the management of the Company, these concentrations of the Company’s common stock could potentially negatively impact the Company and the price of its common stock.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of the Company’s statements in this report, in documents incorporated by reference into this report and in the Company’s future oral and written statements, may be forward-looking. These statements reflect the Company’s beliefs and expectations as to future events and trends affecting the Company’s business, its financial condition and its results of operations. These forward-looking statements are based upon the Company’s current expectations concerning future events and discuss, among other things, anticipated future performance and future business plans. Forward-looking statements are identified by such words and phrases as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could be,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans to,” “will” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside the control of the Company, that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements.

12

In addition to the most significant risk factors described above, the following are important factors that the Company believes could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the Company’s forward-looking statements:

·       legal and environmental proceedings, claims and matters involving the Company;

·       factors affecting the customers, industries and markets that use the Company’s packaging materials and systems;

·       competitive factors;

·       changes in the Company’s relationships with customers and suppliers;

·       changes in tax rates, laws and regulations;

·       changes in interest rates, credit availability and ratings;

·       the Company’s ability to hire, develop and retain talented employees worldwide;

·       the Company’s development and commercialization of successful new products;

·       the Company’s accomplishments in entering new markets and acquiring and integrating new businesses;

·       the Company’s access to financing and other sources of capital;

·       the costs and success of the Company’s key information systems projects;

·       disruptions to data or voice networks;

·       the magnitude and timing of the Company’s capital expenditures and the ultimate value generated from those expenditures;

·       the costs and results of any exit and disposal activities and restructuring programs that the Company may undertake;

·       the Company’s working capital management proficiency;

·       the effect on the Company of new pronouncements by regulatory and accounting authorities;

·       natural disasters, health crises, epidemics and pandemics; and

·       the effects of potential federal asbestos legislation, if enacted.

Except as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1B.               Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.                        Properties

The Company produces products in 120 manufacturing facilities, with 22 of those facilities serving both its food packaging and protective packaging business segments. The Company produces food packaging products in 51 manufacturing facilities, of which 15 were in North America, 12 in the European region, 9 in Latin America, 13 in the Asia Pacific region, and 2 in Africa. The Company produces protective packaging products in 91 manufacturing facilities, of which 42 were in North America, 26 in the European region, 9 in Latin America, 12 in the Asia Pacific region, and 2 in Africa. The Company occupies

13

other facilities containing sales, distribution, technical, warehouse or administrative functions at a number of locations in the United States and in various foreign countries.

In the United States, the Company manufactures food packaging products at facilities in Arkansas, Indiana, Iowa, Mississippi, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Texas. It manufactures protective packaging products at facilities in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas and Washington. Because of the relatively low density of the Company’s air cellular, polyethylene foam and protective mailer products, the Company realizes significant freight savings by locating manufacturing facilities for these products near its customers and distributors.

The Company owns the large majority of its manufacturing facilities. Some of these facilities are subject to secured or other financing arrangements. The Company also leases sites for warehouse and office needs, as well as for the balance of its manufacturing facilities, which are generally smaller sites. The Company’s manufacturing facilities are usually located in general purpose buildings that house the Company’s specialized machinery for the manufacture of one or more products. The Company believes that its manufacturing, warehouse and office facilities are well maintained, suitable for their purposes and adequate for the Company’s needs.

Item 3.                        Legal Proceedings

The information set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Note 16 under the captions “Cryovac Transaction,” “Contingencies Related to the Cryovac Transaction” and “Compliance Matters” is incorporated herein by reference.

At December 31, 2006, the Company was a party to, or otherwise involved in, several federal, state and foreign environmental proceedings and private environmental claims for the cleanup of “Superfund” sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and other sites. The Company may have potential liability for investigation and cleanup of some of these sites. It is the Company’s policy to accrue for environmental cleanup costs if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and if the Company can reasonably estimate an amount or range of costs associated with various alternative remediation strategies, without giving effect to any possible future insurance proceeds. As assessments and cleanups proceed, the Company reviews these liabilities periodically and adjusts its reserves as additional information becomes available. At December 31, 2006, environmental related reserves were not material to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. While it is often difficult to estimate potential liabilities and the future impact of environmental matters, based upon the information currently available to the Company and its experience in dealing with these matters, the Company believes that its potential future liability with respect to these sites is not material to the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is also involved in various other legal actions incidental to its business. The Company believes, after consulting with counsel, that the disposition of these other legal proceedings and matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Item 4.                        Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders during the fourth quarter of 2006.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The information appearing in the table below sets forth the current position or positions held by each executive officer of the Company, the officer’s age as of January 31, 2007, the year in which the officer was first elected to the position currently held with the Company or with the former Sealed Air Corporation,

14

now known as Sealed Air Corporation (US) and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the year in which such person was first elected an officer thereof (as indicated in the footnote to the table).

All of the Company’s officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The Company and its subsidiaries have employed all officers for more than five years except for Mr. Crosier, who first was elected an officer of the Company effective October 1, 2004, and Ms. Davis, who was first elected an officer effective August 10, 2006.

Previously, Mr. Crosier was Partner—Supply Chain, Logistics, Operations Practice of C.F.A. & Associates, a privately-held advisor to small/medium sized businesses on domestic and international growth opportunities, from January 2002 through July 2004, and prior to that was Executive Vice President, Supply Chain Management and Logistics, for Staples Inc., a public company and retailer of office supplies, furniture, technology and services, from June 1998 until December 2001.

Prior to joining the Company in August 2006, Ms. Davis was Vice President, People/Development at the Sun Chemical Company, a global inks and pigment company, where she was a Corporate Leadership Team Member and provided Human Resources functional leadership from July 2002 until October 2005, and prior to that, was from January 2000 until October 2001, Vice President, Human Resources and Administration, for BF Goodrich Performance Materials, which changed its name to Noveon, Inc., a global specialty chemical company.

15

There are no family relationships among any of the Company’s officers or directors.

*                    All persons listed in the table who were first elected officers before 1998 were executive officers of the former Sealed Air Corporation, now known as Sealed Air Corporation (US), prior to the Cryovac transaction in March 1998. Mr. Hickey was first elected President in 1996, first elected Chief Executive Officer in 2000 and first elected a director in 1999. Mr. Kelsey was first elected Senior Vice President in 2003 and first elected Chief Financial Officer in 2002. Ms. White was first elected Vice President in 2003, first elected General Counsel in 1998, and first elected Secretary in 1996.

16

Part II

Item 5.                        Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol SEE. The table below sets forth the quarterly high and low closing sales prices of the common stock for 2005 and 2006 as reported in the New York Stock Exchange composite listing.

Holders

As of January 31, 2007, there were approximately 7,900 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock.

Dividends

There are no restrictions that currently materially limit the Company’s ability to pay dividends or that the Company reasonably believes are likely to limit materially the future payment of dividends on the common stock. On January 30, 2006, the Company announced that it was initiating payment of a quarterly cash dividend. The Company used cash of $48.6 million during 2006 to pay quarterly cash dividends of $0.15 per common share on March 17, June 16, September 15, and December 15, 2006. Previously, the Company had not paid cash dividends on its Common Stock during the periods presented.

On February 16, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had declared a two-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend payable on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record of outstanding shares of its common stock at the close of business on March 2, 2007. The Company’s Board of Directors also increased the Company’s quarterly cash dividend by 33% to $0.20 per common share, declaring a quarterly cash dividend payable on the pre-split shares of the Company’s common stock on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2007. The Company currently expects that comparable cash dividends will continue to be paid in future quarters. From time to time, the Company will consider other means of returning value to its stockholders based on its financial condition and results of operations. There is no guarantee that the Company’s Board of Directors will declare any further dividends.

17

Common Stock Performance Comparisons

The following graph shows, for the five years ended December 31, 2006, the cumulative total return on an investment of $100 assumed to have been made on December 31, 2001 in the Company’s common stock. The graph compares this return (“SAC”) with that of comparable investments assumed to have been made on the same date in (a) the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (“Composite S&P 500”), and (b) the containers and packaging segment of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index (“Containers & Packaging”), the published Standard & Poor’s market segment for the Company.

Total return for each assumed investment assumes the reinvestment of all dividends on December 31 of the year in which the dividends were paid.

18

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The table below sets forth the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.10 per share, that the Company repurchased in each month of the quarter ended December 31, 2006. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Company’s plans or programs is set forth below.

(1)          The Company purchased all shares during the quarter ended December 31, 2006 pursuant to its publicly announced program (described below and under the caption “Repurchases of Capital Stock,” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), except for (a) shares withheld from awards under the Company’s 1998 contingent stock plan pursuant to the provision thereof that permits tax withholding obligations or other legally required charges to be satisfied by having the Company withhold shares from an award under that plan and (b) shares repurchased pursuant to the repurchase option provision of its 1998 contingent stock plan  (See table below). The price calculations in column (b) in the table above only include shares purchased as part of its publicly announced program and do not include commissions. For shares withheld for tax withholding obligations or other legally required charges, the Company withholds shares at a price equal to their fair market value. In accordance with the repurchase option provision of its 1998 contingent stock plan, the Company repurchased shares at the issue price of the shares, which was $1.00 per share.

(2)          On June 29, 1998, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the purchase of up to five percent of the Company’s then issued and outstanding capital stock on an as-converted basis. On April 14, 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the purchase of up to an additional five percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock as of June 30, 2000 on an as-converted basis. On November 3, 2000, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the purchase of up to an additional five percent of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock as of October 31, 2000 on an as-converted basis. At the time of these authorizations, the Company’s capital stock comprised its common stock and its Series A

19

convertible preferred stock. Prior to its redemption in July 2003, each share of the Company’s Series A convertible preferred stock was convertible into 0.885 shares of the Company’s common stock. These authorizations compose a single program, which has no set expiration date. As of the close of business on December 31, 2006, 16,977,147 shares of the Company’s common stock were authorized to be repurchased under this program, 15,376,571 shares had been repurchased (including preferred shares on an as-converted basis), leaving 1,600,576 shares of common stock authorized for repurchase under the program.

Item 6.                        Selected Financial Data

(1)          In November 2002, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the appropriate parties to resolve all current and future asbestos-related claims made against it and its affiliates in connection with the Cryovac transaction. In connection with this settlement, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $850.1 million in the consolidated statement of operations in 2002, which resulted in the Company’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002. The parties signed a definitive settlement agreement as of November 10, 2003 consistent with the terms of the agreement in principle. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)          In 2006, the Company recorded $15.6 million of charges related to its global manufacturing strategy. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company incurred restructuring and other charges of $33 million relating to global profit improvement initiatives implemented to improve the Company’s operating efficiencies and cost structure. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)          In 2004, the Company incurred losses of $32.2 million due to debt redemptions and repurchases. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In 2003, the Company incurred losses of $33.6 million due to debt redemptions and repurchases.

20

(4)          On January 30, 2006, the Company announced that it was initiating payment of a quarterly cash dividend. The Company used cash of $48.6 million during 2006 to pay quarterly cash dividends of $0.15 per common share on March 17, June 16, September 15, and December 15, 2006.

(5)          In July 2003, the Company issued $1,281.3 million of senior notes. On July 18, 2003, the Company used the net proceeds from these offerings and additional cash on hand, approximately $1,298.1 million in the aggregate, to redeem its Series A convertible preferred stock at the redemption price of $51.00 per share.

(6)   On February 16, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had declared a two-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend payable on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record of outstanding shares of its common stock at the close of business on March 2, 2007. The Company’s Board of Directors also increased the Company’s quarterly cash dividend by 33% to $0.20 per common share, declaring a quarterly cash dividend payable on the pre-split shares of the Company’s common stock on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2007. Information presented in the selected financial data has not been restated to reflect the two-for-one stock split. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(7)          On July 19, 2006, the Company’s 5.625% euro notes with a face value of €200.0 million matured. These notes were included in the current portion of long-term debt at December 31, 2005. The Company used available cash of $251.7 million to retire this debt. Interest on the 5.625% euro notes was payable annually in arrears, with the final payment of $14.2 million made upon maturity of the euro notes.

(8)          EBIT is defined as earnings (loss) before interest expense and provisions for income taxes. EBITDA is defined as EBIT plus depreciation and amortization. EBIT and EBITDA do not purport to represent net earnings or net cash provided by operating activities as those terms are defined under generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered as an alternative to such measurements or as indicators of the Company’s performance. The Company’s definitions of EBIT and EBITDA may not be comparable with similarly-titled measures used by other companies. EBIT and EBITDA are among the indicators used by the Company’s management to measure the performance of the Company’s operations and thus the Company’s management believes such information may be useful to investors. Such measures are also among the criteria upon which performance-based compensation may be based. The following is a reconciliation of net earnings (loss) to EBIT and EBITDA:

21

Item 7.                        Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” should be read together with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes set forth in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All amounts and percentages are approximate due to rounding.

Introduction

The Company manufactures and sells a wide range of food and protective packaging products, operating in the United States and in 50 other countries, with products distributed in those countries and in other parts of the world.

The Company operates in two reportable business segments, Food Packaging and Protective Packaging. The Company’s principal food packaging products are flexible materials, associated packaging equipment systems, rigid containers and absorbent pads. These products, many of which bear the Cryovac trademark, package a broad range of perishable foods. The Company primarily sells the products in this segment to food processors, distributors, supermarket retailers and food service businesses.

The Company’s principal protective packaging products provide cushioning, surface protection and void fill. The Company primarily sells its protective packaging products and systems to distributors and manufacturers in a wide variety of industries. The products in this segment enable end users to provide a high degree of protection in packaging their items. They also aid product display and merchandising.

The Company’s global sales and marketing staff numbered approximately 2,500 employees in the countries in which it operates, who sell and market the Company’s products through a large number of distributors, fabricators and converters, as well as directly to end users such as food processors, food service businesses, and manufacturers. The Company has no material long-term contracts for the distribution of its products. In 2006, no customer or affiliated group of customers accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s consolidated net sales. Although net sales of both food packaging products and protective packaging products have tended to be slightly higher in the fourth quarter, the Company does not consider seasonality to be material to its consolidated business or to either reportable business segment.

Competition for most of the Company’s packaging products is based primarily on packaging performance characteristics, service and price. Competition is also based upon innovations in packaging technology and, as a result, the Company maintains ongoing research and development programs to enable it to maintain technological leadership.

The Company’s net sales are sensitive to developments in its customers’ business or market conditions, changes in the global economy, and the effects of foreign currency translation. Its costs can vary with changes in petrochemical-related costs, which are not within the Company’s control. Consequently, the Company’s management focuses on reducing those costs that the Company can control and using petrochemical-based raw materials as efficiently as possible. The Company also believes that its global presence helps to insulate it from localized changes in business conditions that may more strongly affect some of its competitors.

As is discussed below, the Company’s businesses are managed to generate substantial cash flow. The Company believes that its strong cash flow will permit it to continue to spend on innovative research and development and to invest in its business by means of acquisitions and capital expenditures for property and equipment. Moreover, its ability to generate substantial cash flow should provide the Company with the flexibility to modify its capital structure as the need or opportunity arises. This cash flow, along with accumulated cash and funds available under its credit facilities, should enable the Company to make the

22

settlement payment, including interest, that is expected to be required of the Company upon consummation of a plan of reorganization in the W. R. Grace & Co. bankruptcy, as discussed below.

In addition to investing in its business, the Company uses its cash flow to reduce debt and to return value to its shareholders. On January 30, 2006, the Company announced that it was initiating payment of a quarterly cash dividend. The Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per common share that was payable on March 17, June 16, September 15, and December 15, 2006. On February 16, 2007, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had declared a two-for-one stock split to be effected in the form of a stock dividend payable on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record of outstanding shares of its common stock at the close of business on March 2, 2007. The Company’s Board of Directors also increased the Company’s quarterly cash dividend by 33% to $0.20 per common share, declaring a quarterly cash dividend payable on the pre-split shares of the Company’s common stock on March 16, 2007 to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2007. In addition, on July 19, 2006, the Company’s 5.625% euro notes with a face value of €200.0 million matured. The Company used available cash of $251.7 million to retire this debt.

Highlights for the Company’s year 2006 compared with 2005 and 2004 were:

Net Sales

The principal factors contributing to changes in net sales in the three years ended December 31, 2006 were changes in unit volume, changes in product mix and increases in average selling prices. In addition, the 2006 period had increased volumes from acquired businesses. The 2005 period was impacted by the effects of foreign currency translation while the impact in 2006 was minimal.

23

Net sales in 2006 increased 6% to $4,327.9 million compared with $4,085.1 million in 2005. The components of the increase in net sales for 2006 were as follows (dollars in millions):

In 2006, foreign currency translation had a negligible impact on net sales. During the first six months of 2006, net sales had an unfavorable impact from foreign currency translation primarily from the weakness of foreign currencies in Europe which were offset in the second half of 2006 by their strengthening against the U.S. dollar. In addition, the Brazilian real and the Canadian dollar strengthened all year against the U.S. dollar offset by the weakness of foreign currencies in Asia Pacific.

Net sales for 2005 increased 8% to $4,085.1 million compared with $3,798.1 million in 2004. The components of the increase in net sales for 2005 were as follows (dollars in millions):

Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact on net sales of $57.3 million in 2005. Excluding the positive effect of foreign currency translation, net sales would have increased 6% compared with 2004. The favorable foreign currency translation impact on net sales for the full year of 2005 was primarily due to the strengthening of foreign currencies in the Asia Pacific region, Brazil and Europe against the U.S. dollar. The full year favorable impact of $57.3 million includes an unfavorable fourth quarter impact of $10.9 million, primarily due to the weakness of foreign currencies in Europe against the U.S. dollar.

Net sales of the Company’s food packaging segment, which consists primarily of the Company’s Cryovac® food packaging products, constituted 62% of net sales in 2006, 2005 and 2004. The Company’s protective packaging segment contributed the balance of net sales. This segment aggregates the Company’s protective packaging products and shrink packaging products, all of which are used principally for non-food packaging applications.

Food Packaging Segment Sales

Net sales of food packaging products increased 7% in 2006 to $2,702.9 million compared with $2,532.1 million in 2005 and increased 8% in 2005 compared with $2,346.9 million in 2004. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact on this segment of $2.4 million in 2006 and when this impact is excluded, it would not have changed the net sales increase over the prior year. When compared with 2004, excluding the positive foreign currency translation effect of $42.3 million, net sales for this segment in 2005 would have increased 6% compared with 2004.

24

During 2006, strong unit volume growth, primarily in Latin America, the positive impact of the Company’s 2006 acquisitions and selling price increases in North America added to sales growth during the year. In 2005 unit volumes increased in all regions of the world, with the Asia Pacific and Latin America regions having the primary impact. The segment also benefited in 2005 from price/mix due in part to selling price increases.

Flexible Packaging Materials and Related Systems

Among the classes of products in the food packaging segment, net sales of flexible packaging materials and related systems increased 6% to $2,247.6 million in 2006 compared with $2,122.8 million in 2005 and increased 7% in 2005 compared with 2004 net sales of $1,976.5 million. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of $3.0 million in 2006 for flexible packaging materials and related systems. Excluding the positive foreign currency translation effect, the increase in net sales for flexible packaging materials and related systems would have remained the same at 6% compared with 2005.

Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of $37.3 million in 2005 for flexible packaging materials and related systems. Excluding the positive foreign currency translation effect, net sales for flexible packaging materials and related systems would have increased 6% compared with 2004.

The components of the increase in net sales for 2006 and 2005 were as follows (dollars in millions):

Rigid Packaging and Absorbent Pads

Net sales of rigid packaging and absorbent pads, the other class of products in the food packaging segment, increased 11% to $455.3 million compared with $409.3 million in 2005 and increased 11% in 2005 compared with 2004 net sales of $370.4 million.

Foreign currency translation had a minimal unfavorable impact of $0.6 million in 2006 for rigid packaging and absorbent pads. Excluding the unfavorable effect of foreign currency translation, the increase in net sales in 2006 would have remained the same at 11% compared with 2005. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of $5.1 million in 2005 for rigid packaging and absorbent pads. Excluding the positive effect of foreign currency translation, net sales of rigid packaging and absorbent pads would have increased 9% compared with 2004.

The components of the increase in net sales for 2006 and 2005 were as follows (dollars in millions):

25

The Company sells foam and solid plastic trays and containers that customers use to package a wide variety of food products. The Company manufactures such products in its own facilities in various regions or has them fabricated by other manufacturers. The Company’s net sales of such products fabricated by other manufacturers were $157.3 million, $119.4 million and $83.5 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Protective Packaging Segment Sales

Net sales of protective packaging products increased 5% to $1,625.0 million in 2006 compared with $1,553.0 million in 2005 and increased 7% in 2005 compared with 2004 sales of $1,451.2 million. During 2006, the positive impact of selling price increases in North America helped drive sales growth. In 2005, sales growth in this segment was balanced between unit volume growth of $39.7 million, primarily in North America, and a positive price/mix impact of $37.5 million, primarily in North America and to a lesser extent in Europe, in part due to selling price increases.

Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of $1.0 million in 2006 for this segment,which would not have changed the net sales growth compared with 2005. In 2005, foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of $15 million for this segment. Excluding the positive foreign currency translation effect, net sales in 2005 for the protective packaging segment would have increased 6% compared with 2004.

The classes of products within the protective packaging segment are cushioning and surface protection products and other products. Other products within the protective packaging segment represented approximately 1% of consolidated net sales in 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Sales by Geographic Region

Net sales from operations in the United States represented 48% of net sales in 2006 and 2005. Net sales from U.S. operations increased 5% in 2006 to $2,066.3 million compared with $1,972.9 million in 2005. Net sales from international operations increased 7% in 2006 to $2,261.6 million compared with $2,112.2 million in 2005. Excluding the $1.4 million positive foreign currency translation effect, the increase in international net sales would have remained the same at 7% compared with 2005. The components of the increase in net sales by geographic region for 2006 were as follows (dollars in millions):

26

Net sales from operations in the United States represented 48% and 49% of net sales in 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net sales from U.S. operations increased 7% in 2005 to $1,972.9 million compared with $1,851.8 million in 2004. Net sales from international operations increased 9% in 2005 to $2,112.2 million compared with $1,946.3 million in 2004. Excluding the $57.3 million positive foreign currency translation effect, international net sales would have increased 6% compared with 2004. The components of the increase in net sales by geographic region for 2005 were as follows (dollars in millions):